Gippsland › Latest news › Tim Bull MP

Tim Bull blasts One Gippsland for supporting Andrews Labor Victorian Budget neglect and harm of regional priorities and industries

Gippsland East Nationals MP, Tim Bull, criticised One Gippsland for supporting a State Budget that neglected their priorities and harmed the region's industries and infrastructure.

By news@gippsland - 24th May 2023 - Back to News

Gippsland East Nationals MP, Tim Bull, has blasted One Gippsland for "welcoming" a State Budget that delivered none of the organisation's key wish list priorities, cut roads maintenance, agriculture and regional development funding and announced the decimation of the timber industry that employs thousands in the region.

One Gippsland overlooks the negatives for our area and promotes state-wide policies, resembling a government release rather than an advocacy group

One Gippsland overlooks the negatives for our area and promotes state-wide policies, resembling a government release rather than an advocacy group

Misguided advocacy

Mr Bull said, "The One Gippsland media release confirmed my suspicions that this entity is nonsense, and a long way from the 'peak advocacy body for the Gippsland region' that it claims to be. They prepared a wish list of projects, to my eye had none funded, and in addition to being ignored, the government cut funding streams important to the regions and announced that one of our key industries is being destroyed with a paltry compensation package, with no forewarning to the impacted families, or consultation - and they welcomed it!"

"It is a group that appears to come together for opportunistic benefit and have a brain dump of isolated local projects with a 'we will support yours if you support ours mantra' rather than develop a coherent regional strategy. The perilous state of our roads is among the biggest issues in our region and when it needed a massive boost to funding, the roads maintenance funding was cut 25% this year and is lower than 2014/15."

"The agriculture Budget was slashed again and is now 24% lower than it was in 2020, Regional Development funding was cut again and is now 80% down on what it was three years ago, rendering it almost non-existent. The decimation of Regional Development Victoria should be something our 'peak advocacy group' is standing up and fighting for, not turning a blind eye to and welcoming it," said Mr Bull.

Neglected concerns

Mr Bull said, "All these negatives for our area, and there are plenty more, are ignored and instead One Gippsland plucks out examples of some state-wide policies not specific to our region in its support of the State Budget. It reads more like a Labor Government media release than that of a regional advocacy group."

"This entity is predominantly made up of the six Gippsland councils and they seem to have a policy of never offering any real criticism. If you claim to be an advocacy body you have to agitate when needed, or you are simply not an advocacy group," said Mr Bull.

Priority disagreement

Mr Bull added, "And as for their current wish list, they have the duplication of the Mitchell River bridge as the highest priority for East Gippsland. To have this as a higher priority than the badly needed new Bairnsdale Hospital is just madness.

"One Gippsland has no representation from a number of our major industries and is silent when one is crushed. I'd be more than happy for my two councils - East Gippsland and Wellington - to leave this organisation as it clearly does not represent our best interests in eastern Victoria and is not what it claims to be," he said.

Pictures from Kellie O'Callaghan Facebook page.


Source: www.gippsland.com

Published by: news@gippsland.com



Edit this news article




Baw Baw Bass Coast Cardinia East Gippsland Latrobe City South Gippsland Wellington
© 2001-2024 gippsland.com Print this page | Subscribe to Newsletter | Feedback / Inquiries | Login
Care has been taken in compiling the component parts of this website. However, Gippsland.com does not warrant or represent that the website is free from errors or omissions, that the qualifications claimed by an advertiser are valid or that the published details of any advertiser are as stated on the website. Please review the full statement of our Terms and Conditions of Service and disclaimer.