Latest News

• Add My News • Search Old News

Gippsland › Latest news › Liberal Nationals

The Nationals and farm groups warn EPBC changes create uncertainty for farmers and land management

Nationals leader Matt Canavan met with farm groups over concerns Labor’s EPBC changes could create uncertainty and regulatory risks. Industry wants amendments, clearer guidance, mapping, support tools and independent review.

By news@gippsland - 17th August 2026 - Back to News

Leader of The Nationals Matt Canavan has met with the National Farmers' Federation (NFF) and AgForce, as concerns arise about Labor's first guide of the EPBC Act into Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Matt Canavan met farm groups amid concerns Labor’s EPBC changes could increase regulation and affect farming activities near waterways in Great Barrier Reef catchments

Matt Canavan met farm groups amid concerns Labor’s EPBC changes could increase regulation and affect farming activities near waterways in Great Barrier Reef catchments

Demanding regulatory clarity

Senator Canavan said farmers are increasingly worried that the guide was cementing a new form of farm police. "Labor has done a deal with the Greens to change our environmental laws. Those changes used the international treaty powers to expand these laws to cover anything a farmer does within 50 metres of a watercourse in the Great Barrier Reef catchment area."

NFF President Hamish McIntyre said unless the government is open to amending the legislation, which industry continues to ask for, better pathways are needed. "Our members are telling us farmers are confused, frustrated and increasingly concerned about what these changes could mean for everyday farming activities."

"Farmers should not be left wondering whether routine land management activities could expose them to regulatory action. We've made it clear to the government that the current approach is creating uncertainty. The government needs to listen to those concerns and work with industry on practical solutions, including investment in mapping, decision-support tools and extension services," Mr McIntyre said.

Regulatory impacts to farmers

AgForce CEO Niki Ford said consultation only has value if there is a pathway to change. "Where producers identify unintended or unworkable consequences, there needs to be a transparent EPA process for those issues to be assessed and for guidance, interpretation or regulation to be amended where necessary without fear of compliance actions."

"Regulation that stops farmers actively managing their land can deliver the opposite of the environmental outcome it was designed to achieve. That is a risk we cannot ignore. These reforms have not been properly stress-tested against Queensland farming systems. An early independent review is essential to identify unintended impacts and correct them before they become entrenched," Ms Ford said.

Shadow Minister for Agriculture Darren Chester said the EPBC framework was originally designed to assess one-off development proposals, not the cyclical and ongoing land management activities that occur as part of normal agricultural production. "Farmers are now extremely concerned they are unintentionally breaking the law, with limited to no information to assist in making decisions. It has resulted in genuine fears farmers could get taken to court and be put out of business."

Treaty audit targets overreach

Senator Canavan also announced the need for an audit of the international treaties that Australia is a party to at The Nationals conference this weekend. "Any agreement that Australia is a party to must serve the interests of Australians, not foreigners. That's why it is time for an audit."

"Too often, international agreements have become weaponised to take away the basic rights of farmers and everyday Australians, which is exactly what we are seeing now with the EPBC Act. In many farms this means the Federal government has effectively taken over control of their entire farm, when it should be the states that have control of basic land planning issues," he said.

Mr McIntyre said the NFF also supports an audit of international treaties, quoting the 30 by 30 nature target as an example of a treaty that places unnecessary burden on the private estate. "International 'targets' that seek to intrude into sustainable land management practices are not welcome and must be resisted," Mr McIntyre said.

Pictures from Matt Canavan MP website.


Source: http://gippsland.com/

Published by: news@gippsland.com



Edit this news article




Related Articles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baw Baw Bass Coast Cardinia East Gippsland Latrobe City South Gippsland Wellington
© 2001-2026 gippsland.com Print this page | Subscribe to Newsletter | Feedback / Inquiries | Login
Care has been taken in compiling the component parts of this website. However, Gippsland.com does not warrant or represent that the website is free from errors or omissions, that the qualifications claimed by an advertiser are valid or that the published details of any advertiser are as stated on the website. Please review the full statement of our Terms and Conditions of Service and disclaimer.