Latest News

Add My News • Search Old News

Gippsland › Latest news › Darren Chester MP

Coalition and crossbench Senators reject Albanese government’s Defence Honours Bill, citing consultation failures, appeal rights removal

Coalition and crossbench Senators oppose the Albanese government’s Defence Honours Bill, citing lack of consultation, threat to veterans’ appeal rights, and overwhelming stakeholder opposition, urging its complete abandonment.

By news@gippsland - 21st November 2025 - Back to News

Coalition and crossbench Senators have joined forces to reject the Albanese government’s plan to undermine the defence honours and awards system, which veterans groups have described as ‘disgraceful’. The Defence Amendment (Defence Honours and Awards Appeal Tribunal) Bill 2025 was introduced into the House of Representatives on August 28, 2025, without any consultation with the Coalition or key stakeholders in the ex-service community.

Darren Chester criticised the Albanese government’s Defence Honours Bill, citing lack of stakeholder support, appeal rights removal, and arbitrary 20-year limits on veterans’ heroic actions

Darren Chester criticised the Albanese government’s Defence Honours Bill, citing lack of stakeholder support, appeal rights removal, and arbitrary 20-year limits on veterans’ heroic actions

Veterans oppose bill

The referral of the Bill to the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee was the first opportunity for Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel, veterans and their families, to provide substantive input into the sweeping changes proposed by the Department of Defence and the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs.

A total of 75 written submissions were received, with all but one opposing the legislation (from the Department of Defence), and opposition Senators have now tabled their dissenting reports calling for the Bill to be abandoned.

Bill sparks backlash

Shadow Minister for Veterans’ Affairs Darren Chester said the Albanese government had received no support from key stakeholders and provided no evidence that the Tribunal needed wholesale changes. "The legislation is unsalvageable because it strips away the appeal rights of ADF personnel and veterans while also placing a 20-year time limit on the heroic actions of our servicemen and women

"The Coalition believes the Tribunal has acted with professionalism, integrity and due diligence in fulfilling its statutory responsibilities since it was established in 2011 under the Rudd-Gillard government. We have no idea why the Labor Party is trying to place a use-by date on ‘we will remember them’. As a matter of principle, the Coalition will always seek to provide bipartisan support for legislation which impacts the health and wellbeing of Australian Defence Force personnel, veterans and their families," Mr Chester said.

Coalition rejects bill

Mr Chester added, "However, the Coalition remains unconvinced there is any significant problem being solved by the legislation and recommends the government abandon the Bill in its entirety. Both the Minister and the Department of Defence have failed at the first hurdle to provide any credible reason in justification of this root and branch restructure of an independent authority.

"The implementation of key recommendations of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide should be given higher priority by the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs than this mean-spirited legislation," Mr Chester said. The Senate is expected to vote on a motion next week that seeks to discharge the Bill.

Pictures from Darren Chester Facebook page.


Source: http://gippsland.com/

Published by: news@gippsland.com



Edit this news article




Related Articles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baw Baw Bass Coast Cardinia East Gippsland Latrobe City South Gippsland Wellington
© 2001-2026 gippsland.com Print this page | Subscribe to Newsletter | Feedback / Inquiries | Login
Care has been taken in compiling the component parts of this website. However, Gippsland.com does not warrant or represent that the website is free from errors or omissions, that the qualifications claimed by an advertiser are valid or that the published details of any advertiser are as stated on the website. Please review the full statement of our Terms and Conditions of Service and disclaimer.