Gippsland › Latest news › Melina Bath MP

Central Highlands State Forests

Melina Bath's adjournment matter to the Environment Minister addresses distress from overlapping forest investigations, urging protection for bush-user activities and public land access.

By news@gippsland - 31st July 2024 - Back to News

My adjournment matter this evening is for the Minister for Environment. This is a tale of two concurrent investigations, both of which are causing considerable distress to thousands of my constituents in the Eastern Victoria Region and indeed across the state. One is the eminent panel - these are your words, Minister, not mine - for the Central Highlands state forest, which is about to deliver its final report and recommendations through VEAC, the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council, to you, Minister.

Melina Bath seeks the minister's assurance that traditional bush-user activities will not be restricted and that public land access will be preserved during the investigation

Melina Bath seeks the minister's assurance that traditional bush-user activities will not be restricted and that public land access will be preserved during the investigation

Public land debate

The other is the Great Outdoors Task Force's future of our state forests task force - again, your terminology, not mine - that you announced on 1 April this year. I quote you: Victorians have a landmark opportunity to help design the future of the state's public land estate - which now includes more than 1.8 million hectares of forest previously used for timber harvesting.

The Great Outdoors Taskforce is supposed to be assessing all state forests, including that of the Central Highlands, so you are double dipping in these two different organisations. There is cross membership in these, of some but not all. Karen Cain and VEAC's Mellissa Wood are in both, and both have a history of advocating for the locking up of more Crown land into parks and reserves.

Mr Dear and Mr Robinson I know are very good people from Gippsland, and I am sure they are seeking a balanced analysis, where the former clearly have a bias. There are 17,000 Victorians who have already signed the petition that I am sponsoring on behalf of bush users, and they want to send a clear message to you and your bureaucrats: no more new national parks.

Conservation vs. access

The petition and movement are in response to massive community concern at Labor's woeful management of the public land estate as it is, noting that the reclassification of state forests to national parks will not ensure greater health for the environment or the preservation of biodiversity.

It will only seek to exclude traditional pursuits that provide wellbeing to thousands and thousands of Victorians. Public exclusion of traditional pursuits does not equate to better conservation; better land management and active management of our forest estates, whatever the land tenure, is far more important. This government has 60 per cent of the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action workforce sitting in metropolitan Melbourne. We need more boots and less suits in our environment.

Bush users such as hunters, four-wheel drivers, horse riders, trail bike riders, prospectors and fossickers, anglers and those Victorians who like to camp in state forests with their family and their pet will face exclusion. You are saying in the Guardian that the Nationals are running a scare campaign. The action I seek, Minister, is for you to rule out the curtailment of traditional bush-user activities right across this investigation and allow people public access to public land.

Pictures from Melina Bath MP Instagram page.


Source: http://gippsland.com/

Published by: news@gippsland.com



Edit this news article




Baw Baw Bass Coast Cardinia East Gippsland Latrobe City South Gippsland Wellington
© 2001-2024 gippsland.com Print this page | Subscribe to Newsletter | Feedback / Inquiries | Login
Care has been taken in compiling the component parts of this website. However, Gippsland.com does not warrant or represent that the website is free from errors or omissions, that the qualifications claimed by an advertiser are valid or that the published details of any advertiser are as stated on the website. Please review the full statement of our Terms and Conditions of Service and disclaimer.