Gippsland › Latest news › Russell Broadbent MP
Universal childcare: Fair solution or costly burden? Exploring the gaps in the policy debate
Universal childcare promises fairness and accessibility but raises concerns about high costs, limited workforce impact, and disproportionate benefits for high-income earners, leaving many families questioning its effectiveness and fairness.
The term 'universal childcare' sounds pretty reasonable, doesn't it? It implies that childcare will be fair, accessible, and the right decision for every family. Judith Sloan in The Australian, says the Prime Minister plans to make universal childcare a key element of his election campaign. But when I started peeling back the layers of this policy, I noticed a few red flags.
Many Australian families prefer time with their young children, but rising costs force reliance on childcare, benefiting private-sector profits
Childcare fairness debate
Firstly, as Judith says: The biggest winners will be high-income earners who currently receive proportionately lower child care fee subsidies than those on lower incomes.' Doesn't sound very fair now, does it?
It's important to understand that sending children to childcare is not a first option for many Australian families, even though it may be becoming the norm. In fact, I think many parents are reluctant to use childcare too soon - many want to spend time with their children, especially when they're babies.
But in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis, most parents have no choice but to rely on two incomes to pay the mortgage and feed the kids. So it appears childcare has become a rather lucrative business model for the private sector.
Childcare cost puzzle
In Melbourne, centre-based childcare, which is the most common option, costs anywhere between $70 to $185 dollars PER DAY. When you have multiple kids to factor in, it hardly makes the return to work worth it.
The Productivity Commission recommends that 30 hours, or three days, per week should be made available to all children aged up to five years. Modelling suggests that this policy will have a small impact on workforce participation, adding an additional 17,000 full time equivalent workers.
According to Judith Sloan, the cost of Universal Child Care works out to be more than $200,000 per job created. Doesn't seem like the best use of taxpayer dollars to me. At the end of the day, we all want what's best for our kids and whatever makes life easier for parents. Universal Child Care sounds like a great idea. But as I said earlier this childcare policy puzzle has a few missing pieces.
Pictures from Gippsland Lakes Complete Health Children's Centre Facebook page.
Source: http://gippsland.com/
Published by: news@gippsland.com
Latest News
Tim Bull and RSL sub-branches encouraged to apply for funding to restore war memorials and upgrade veteran services facilitiesAllan Labor government allocates $2M in disaster recovery grants for restoring Victoria's heritage landmarks
Cycling Without Age Gippsland launches free trishaw rides in Lakes Entrance to combat social isolation
Tim Bull criticises Labor's free camping policy for "ghost camping" and its negative impact on local communities
Bryan Watterson, 2025 Lyrebird award winner leading regional environmental restoration efforts
Celebrating John Topp's lifelong dedication to native plants and conservation in Gippsland's natural environment
Passionate young volunteers protecting the environment through adventurous, creative, and impactful activities across Gippsland
West Gippsland CMA 2024 Lyrebird winners - Kate Mirams and Peter Neaves inspiring change through soil health and sustainability
Bass Coast announces Maree Clarke selected for Berninneit Public Art Commission with community-crafted Murrini glass canoe design
Bass Coast Council addresses coastal vandalism with signs highlighting Inverloch foreshore vegetation damage and restoration efforts